![]() Data were collected at baseline and 3 months after FS-LASIK. IOP examinations were conducted between 8 and 11 A.M. All patients had IOP measurement with ORA and Corvis ST by two blinded independent expert examiners. In this prospective cohort study, 56 eyes from 56 consecutive patients scheduled for FS-LASIK were enrolled. To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by ORA-IOPcc and Corvis-bIOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). The mean difference of 4.2 mm Hg can have significant clinical implications, particularly in the management of glaucoma patients. The Icare tonometer consistently under estimated IOP compared to GAT, irrespective of CCT ranges and other subgroup analyses. 25.2 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) and within each subanalysis. Mean ic100 IOPs were also significantly lower than mean GAT IOPs within each IOP strata ≤12 (7.9 vs. ![]() Mean IOP was significantly lower when measured by ic100 than by GAT (12.1 vs. There was moderate agreement between ic100 and GAT IOP measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.73). ![]() IOP measurements were investigated in all eyes, by IOP substrata, by CCT group, by number of topical glaucoma medications, and diagnosis. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using a hand-held pachymeter. This cross-sectional study measured IOP in 1,000 eyes (500 left and 500 right) using the Icare ic100 and GAT. The objective was to compare the IOP measured using Icare ic100 and GAT. Many devices have been developed to measure IOP with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) considered the gold standard for IOP measurement. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) forms a crucial component in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |